The bridge collapse (again)
Aug. 2nd, 2007 11:35 amEverything about the 35W bridge collapsing in Mpls sucks, and I understand that the first few hours were traumatic to some degree for pretty much everyone. It's unlike a building collapsing--because you could reasonably know that your relatives/friends weren't supposed to be in that building. With 35W, there was a CHANCE that anyone local could have been on that bridge at that moment. It wasn't a big chance, but still, a chance. Immediate uncertainty abounded.
Things that irritate me about these kinds of unfortunate tragedies however--the media being witty, and the media seeking blame.
The stupidest thing I heard on the news last night from a FOX 9 reporter: "It's just so ironic that this happened during rush hour when many cars were on the bridge." Then he kept saying that. Over and over. The irony...
I appreciate that it's difficult to do on-the-spot reporting and find the right words, but it is in NO way ironic that a bridge collapsed at a point in the day where it had the most weight on it.
Other things I kept hearing: Was it terrorists? Why didn't they inspect the bridge?
No, it wasn't The Terrorists. How sad that that's the first thing some people's minds jump to. OMG Paranoia! Even in cases of terrorism, my first thought isn't Terrorists. Maybe I'm naive, but I'm not drinking the Terrorists Are Everywhere! kool-aid.
Yes, they inspected the bridges. As recently as 2006. No one surmised that they were in imminent danger of falling on people.
I don't think this is anyone's fault, and I resent the cloud of blame floating around, looking for a place to settle. It sucks that it happened. There's no eloquent way of saying that. It sucks. It's tragic, but it's not anyone's (or really, any departments') fault.
Traffic going into downtown (I work on Washington and Marquette, and take 94 in from St. Paul) also kind of sucked. But I just don't have it in me to care about sitting an extra hour in traffic right now really--it doesn't seem all that important.
Things that irritate me about these kinds of unfortunate tragedies however--the media being witty, and the media seeking blame.
The stupidest thing I heard on the news last night from a FOX 9 reporter: "It's just so ironic that this happened during rush hour when many cars were on the bridge." Then he kept saying that. Over and over. The irony...
I appreciate that it's difficult to do on-the-spot reporting and find the right words, but it is in NO way ironic that a bridge collapsed at a point in the day where it had the most weight on it.
Other things I kept hearing: Was it terrorists? Why didn't they inspect the bridge?
No, it wasn't The Terrorists. How sad that that's the first thing some people's minds jump to. OMG Paranoia! Even in cases of terrorism, my first thought isn't Terrorists. Maybe I'm naive, but I'm not drinking the Terrorists Are Everywhere! kool-aid.
Yes, they inspected the bridges. As recently as 2006. No one surmised that they were in imminent danger of falling on people.
I don't think this is anyone's fault, and I resent the cloud of blame floating around, looking for a place to settle. It sucks that it happened. There's no eloquent way of saying that. It sucks. It's tragic, but it's not anyone's (or really, any departments') fault.
Traffic going into downtown (I work on Washington and Marquette, and take 94 in from St. Paul) also kind of sucked. But I just don't have it in me to care about sitting an extra hour in traffic right now really--it doesn't seem all that important.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 05:02 pm (UTC)I'm just going to wait patiently for the, "It's supposed to rain, so ironically some of you may get wet" report. It will come.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 05:30 pm (UTC)My first thoughts after the initial "are people okay"? . . . My thoughts turn to the contamination in the water, and the economic impacts of this artery being cut . . . *shakes head*
But then, maybe I'm naive, too . . .
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 06:08 pm (UTC)You can't have people in a state of constant vigilance, or that state of vigilance regresses to a norm--where people have their guard lowered again, but THINK they're being vigilant.
The level orange threat level is the new yellow. Red will be the new orange. Who cares? You can't THINK about that stuff on a daily basis and live your life normally--and isn't that the point of terrorism? To disrupt a normal life?
Terrorism didn't even cross my mind in the bridge collapse. My first thought, of course, was "where are my co-workers" (who had just left that area of downtown), my second thoughts, however, turned towards the positive--we can all be grateful that it's summer so that people in the water have a CHANCE to swim. If it were winter, this would have been very much worse all around.
I think that those that would have me thinking of terrorism first would call me naive for not doing so, but really, I think it's rather naive to jump on the terrorism bandwagon.
Additional annoyance from one of the rescuer interviews, "I think you do the American thing and help people."
No. You do the HUMAN thing and help people. Get the jingoism out of the tragedy please.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 06:37 pm (UTC)And yes - similar thoughts of how much worse it could've been had any number of things been different . . . had it not been so warm, had we gotten that storm, had the freeway not been already mostly shut down, had so many people not been already avoiding that route because of the continuing construction, had traffic been flowing freely at 60-75 mph rather than basically stoppped . . . et cetera . . .
It's also sadly amusing to flip channels and hear the differences in language choice among the news stations . . . personally, I'm a fan of Kare11/NBC. Fox is the worst. 5 is somewhere in the middle, and I don't get 4 on my TV. . .
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 06:10 pm (UTC)Yes, I care that cute little kids could have been hurt--but they weren't, so let's get onto some real information, okay?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 06:38 pm (UTC)Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 06:59 pm (UTC)Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 07:05 pm (UTC)Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 07:26 pm (UTC)It's scary to think that our own government is creating a state of terror for its citizens, but I rather like not being alone in not buying into it.
Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 07:30 pm (UTC)It's a good point though. I get so sad/frustrated for my friends who jump on the terrorist wagon...
Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 08:18 pm (UTC)Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 07:27 pm (UTC)Re: Similar Thoughts . . .
Date: 2007-08-02 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 07:45 pm (UTC)And I know exactly what you mean. Though most people I talk to are equally appalled and frustrated with the "terrorism suspicion first" attitude displayed by the media--suggesting that it may be more the media than the people. Than again, these are people I surround myself with, so it's a very biased sample.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:13 pm (UTC)*sigh* I hate post-tragedy speculation and blame.