![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
pen_gruntI really like Michael Pollan (Omnivore's Dilemma, etc.), but his writing style is very much the same from book to book.
So is his content, mostly.
It's fine. He's an easy read. It's digestible--like so much pop-psychology and the ever-intriguing, rarely-accurate, definitely-untestable, barely-supported anthropological psychology. It's fun, despite its flaws, but should be taken with a grain of salt.
But his books are all the same.
I feel like someone should tell him this.
But it's not like he's not successful. So go with whatever works, I guess.
So is his content, mostly.
It's fine. He's an easy read. It's digestible--like so much pop-psychology and the ever-intriguing, rarely-accurate, definitely-untestable, barely-supported anthropological psychology. It's fun, despite its flaws, but should be taken with a grain of salt.
But his books are all the same.
I feel like someone should tell him this.
But it's not like he's not successful. So go with whatever works, I guess.
